Targeted risk analysis review
None of the held texts sets a fixed period on this consumer; every row below reads no period set by the text. Paste one job that feeds this consumer, for example annual_tra_review, weekly, and the register reads its period against the clocks below, names the gap in hours, and carries the question for its owner.
Matched on the job name or the consumer column by these words: risk analysis, tra review, risk assessment review, risk assessment, risk analysis review.
The clock each rule sets
| Regime | Clock | Clause |
|---|---|---|
| PCI DSS | no clock | PCI DSS 10.4.2.1 Frequency defined by TRAthe frequency the targeted risk analysis defines |
| SP 800-53 | no clock | SP 800-53 CA-7 Continuous monitoringa defined frequency |
Questions this page answers
How often does PCI DSS v4.0 require targeted risk analysis review?
The held text of PCI DSS 10.4.2.1 (Frequency defined by TRA) sets no fixed period: the frequency the targeted risk analysis defines. The frequency of periodic reviews for all other system components is defined in the entity's targeted risk analysis.
How often does NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 require targeted risk analysis review?
The held text of SP 800-53 CA-7 (Continuous monitoring) sets no fixed period: a defined frequency. Requires a system-level continuous monitoring strategy aligned to the organizational one, defining the metrics monitored, the frequencies for monitoring and for assessing control effectiveness, ongoing control assessment, correlation and analysis of the results, response actions, and reporting of security and privacy posture to defined personnel.
What does the register ask the owner of a targeted risk analysis review job?
Which periodic-review frequencies in this register does the analysis justify, and where is that written?
The clauses in full
The frequency of periodic reviews for all other system components is defined in the entity's targeted risk analysis.
What an assessor asks to see: TRA document with risk inputs and chosen cadence; Annual TRA review records; Approval by senior leadership; Mapping of cadence to system criticality. Where it usually falls short: No TRA
Requires a system-level continuous monitoring strategy aligned to the organizational one, defining the metrics monitored, the frequencies for monitoring and for assessing control effectiveness, ongoing control assessment, correlation and analysis of the results, response actions, and reporting of security and privacy posture to defined personnel.
What an assessor asks to see: Documented continuous monitoring strategy with metrics and frequencies; Evidence of ongoing control assessments performed at the stated cadence; Correlation and analysis output showing findings drawn from monitoring data; Posture reports issued to the defined personnel and the actions they triggered. Where it usually falls short: Monitoring reduced to vulnerability scanning, with most controls never reassessed
Requirement text quoted from the standards themselves, published at compliance.theartofservice.com, the same publisher as this register, read against the held text of each standard: our statement of each clause, not the instrument verbatim. Run this job through the register